Talk:Union

I would like to respectfully start this discussion to talk about which information is factual and correct, not "misunderstandings, bad information, and speculation".

--GTA6v1 (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Name: Chapter 271, page 4 uses the word "Union". Page 6 uses the word "Devil Union".
 * 2) Abilities: Page 1 says it can "draw out all of" the devil power. Page 6 says it can add characteristics of the devil to the user's magic.
 * 3) Compatibility: Page 4 says "In Devil-Binding Contracts, the initiative belongs entirely to the one giving the orders. In other words, to the human. That's why I can use Union so easily." -> A Devil-Binding Contract makes it easier to use Union.

From the onset, it is flawed because "union" is a general term. It's like the rune situation: People wanted to make articles about the Heart Kingdom's magic technique but tried to name it "rune" even though runes are used in other instances unrelated to Mana Method. Anything built off that flawed use will be speculative and misleading. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

But this is a defined term, with kanji accompanied by ruby text, isn't it? Not just some words that characters spill out casually.--GTA6v1 (talk) 08:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

No, "union" and "Unite" are different. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)